Notes: Add

This commit is contained in:
Adam Porter 2019-09-02 05:22:11 -05:00
parent 6a6272ef96
commit b9badc3e34

View file

@ -269,6 +269,10 @@ I should benchmark it to see how much difference it makes, because all those ~fs
When tag inheritance is enabled, and the given tags aren't file-level tags, we could search directly to headings containing the matching tags, and then only do per-heading matching on the subtrees. Sometimes that would be much faster. However, that might make the logic special-cased and complicated. Might need a redesign of the whole matching/predicate system to do cleanly. When tag inheritance is enabled, and the given tags aren't file-level tags, we could search directly to headings containing the matching tags, and then only do per-heading matching on the subtrees. Sometimes that would be much faster. However, that might make the logic special-cased and complicated. Might need a redesign of the whole matching/predicate system to do cleanly.
** MAYBE Implement view with tabulated-list-mode or magit-section
[2019-09-02 Mon 05:20] Especially with some of the new packages that make =tabulated-list-mode= easier to use, like =navigel=. However, it would probably break grouping, or require some kind of adapter or extension to do grouping, so I don't know if that would work. Something like =magit-section= would be more flexible, and could be recursively grouped, like in =magit-todos=.
** DONE Byte-compile lambdas ** DONE Byte-compile lambdas
CLOSED: [2018-05-09 Wed 17:30] CLOSED: [2018-05-09 Wed 17:30]
:LOGBOOK: :LOGBOOK: