Docs: Update comparison
This commit is contained in:
parent
538373bb48
commit
035c20fc28
2 changed files with 5 additions and 14 deletions
|
|
@ -566,13 +566,7 @@ Of course, queries like these can already be written with Org Agenda searches, b
|
|||
+lisp +{^\*+\s-+TO-READ\s-}
|
||||
#+END_EXAMPLE
|
||||
|
||||
But with ~org-ql-agenda~, you would write:
|
||||
|
||||
#+BEGIN_SRC elisp
|
||||
(org-ql-agenda
|
||||
(and (regexp "lisp")
|
||||
(todo "TO-READ")))
|
||||
#+END_SRC
|
||||
But with =org-ql-search=, you would write a query like =lisp todo:TO-READ=, or in Lisp syntax, ~(and "lisp" (todo "TO-READ"))~.
|
||||
|
||||
** org-sidebar
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
11
org-ql.info
11
org-ql.info
|
|
@ -1032,11 +1032,8 @@ regular expression syntax, like this:
|
|||
|
||||
+lisp +{^\*+\s-+TO-READ\s-}
|
||||
|
||||
But with ‘org-ql-agenda’, you would write:
|
||||
|
||||
(org-ql-agenda
|
||||
(and (regexp "lisp")
|
||||
(todo "TO-READ")))
|
||||
But with org-ql-search, you would write a query like
|
||||
lisp todo:TO-READ, or in Lisp syntax, ‘(and "lisp" (todo "TO-READ"))’.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
File: README.info, Node: org-sidebar, Prev: Comparison with Org Agenda searches, Up: Notes
|
||||
|
|
@ -1092,8 +1089,8 @@ Node: 0233622
|
|||
Node: 0137655
|
||||
Node: Notes37754
|
||||
Node: Comparison with Org Agenda searches37916
|
||||
Node: org-sidebar38787
|
||||
Node: License39066
|
||||
Node: org-sidebar38788
|
||||
Node: License39067
|
||||
|
||||
End Tag Table
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue